



And now we are back on numerical track! Here we have Day 4, which was Thursday last week (for those of you playing along at home).
12:48am – Woken up by a security guard. “Sorry mate, can’t let you sleep out here. They’re watching you on the cameras”.
I’ve no idea why I was only woken up 4 hours after I’d already been asleep for 4 hours (actually, the last guy who woke me up at Fed Square did so at about 1 am as well), but he was polite and friendly about it, so I packed up and moved along.
I should point out that with the exception of the one unfriendly and unhelpful Tram Information Man, all authority figures so far have been polite and friendly. Perhaps it’s because I’m young and agreeable? I’m not sure, but I was expecting a lot more hostility than I’ve received so far.
1:10am – Wandered away from the building in search of a public loo. Couldn’t find one, so used a discrete back ally instead. Briefly considered sleeping in a concealed churchyard, but still curious to see what sort of attention (from police) sleeping in public in the city would draw, so I settled on a park bench.
7:30am – Woken up by the traffic, I lay on the bench for about 10mins before getting up and starting my day.
Most of the time, passers-by ignore me (with the exception of when I’m asking them for money), but when you’re sleeping in the middle of the city, you get glares of contempt, disgust and down-right revulsion. People really dislike people sleeping in their city.
When I was on the ground outside the building, people either didn’t notice me, were mildly curious when they did, or shied away in fear. My mere presence seemed to indicate that they were in “a bad part of town”, and they’d walk a bit more cautiously for having seen me.
7:40 – Got up. Walking past the church I saw a guy asking for change, being ignored by everyone who went in. That seems a little incongruous, doesn’t it?
I gave him my last dollar. He’d seen me get up from the bench I’d just slept on, so he was shocked and asked me if I was sure. I’m hardly having trouble surviving, so I told him to keep it and kept going.
Pulling out my map, I decided to check out the Queen Vic markets, both for begging potential or the possibility of cheep food.
8am – Passed the State Library of Victoria, which someone recommended to me as free entertainment. It opens at 10am, so I sat outside and did some writing.
On the way to the library I got $2.05 from a lady smoker, and 95c from a guy at the traffic lights.
10am – Library opened. They only allow “small bags” inside for our safety and convenience. I don’t fully understand what they mean by this, but I paid the dollar required to use the locker service.
10:15 – Used the internet for 15mins, checking out the homeless forums (forums.homeless.com.au) and found a particularly interesting thread on why people “choose” to be homeless, which I sent to Gavin to repost (Gavin: You can find it here).
10:30 – Spent a couple of hours reading a biography on Jim Henson. If I could have my lie reflect any entertainer’s, it would probably be Jim Henson. Amazing, fascinating man.
I also learned that Candice Bergen (Shirley Schmidt in Boston Legal) is the daughter of famous ventriloquist, Ed Bergen.
1pm – This isn’t a “library” in the sense that I’m used to. 95% of the books are in “archive”, with the remaining 5% being randomly chosen. To access the bulk of the library, you have to become a member. (As I’m not in possession of a library card, I’m unlikely to become a member any time soon.) (Gavin: I’m not sure if he actually meant “library card”, as having a library card usually means you’re a member already.)
The book that I really came in to read is Justine Larbalestier’s latest novel, “Liar”. I’ve read her blog for years now, and when I came across her novel “How to Ditch Your Fairy” in a bookstore last year, I loved the first few chapters so much that I bought it straight away. To my surprise, there’s a shelf of Young Adult fiction here, and one of the first books I came across was “Liar”.
2pm – My 4 hours were up, but it was raining outside, and I was so keen to finish the book that I went and found someone to give me 85c so that I could stay for longer. Great, great book. I thoroughly recommend it. I’ll probably buy a copy of it first chance I get. Afterwards, I started through Humphrey Carpenter’s biography of Spike Milligan.
6pm – Didn’t particularly want to pay another dollar to stay in the library for the last hour. It was still raining out, so I stayed undercover at the library.
I wanted something a bit different for dinner, so I got enough change from people to get a piece of sushi: 25c from one guy, a dollar from another and 45c from a girl. I’ve never had so many people give such small amounts (I’m not complaining, that was all they had. It’s possibly an effect of asking people outside a library).
On the way up to “Sushi Sushi”, I saw a homeless guy with a cup out, so I gave him 50c. A piece of tuna sushi is $2.30, so on the way back to the library, I gave him the rest of my money: another 55c.
9pm – Lying outside the library thinking (I’d already grabbed an MX and done the sudoku by this point), a girl came up and, unasked, gave me $1.20. She must have been someone who said no earlier, then had a change of heart?
My phone finally died (straight from 2 bars to dead. What is the point of the bar system if it goes from 4, 3, 2, 0?) but fortunately there’s a power-point outside the library.
9:30 – It’s still lightly raining. There are plenty of undercover space outside the library, but again, I don’t want to risk taking up valuable real-estate. When it’s raining, this would be the first place I’d go, so I leave all the covered areas, and set up on a park bench under a tree. It offers partial cover while it’s raining lightly. Only the occasional drop comes through.
10pm – I drift off to sleep.
Up Next: Day 5






More Options ...
Categories
Tag Cloud
Blog RSS
Comments RSS

Void
Life
Earth
Wind « Default
Water
Fire
Light 
Wow – homeless people on the streets are shunned or ignored. They also take refuge in libraries and parks. THIS IS BRAND NEW INFORMATION!
It could be for Peter. He’s a little thick and he likes to experience things first hand rather than dismissing thing as downright obvious and therefore beneath him.
Oh! Glad he found it.
“with the remaining 5% being randomly chosen.”
Garbage.
Whoops – that’s ruder than I meant! I posted accidentally while I was deleting a sentence.
What I meant to say was that no library chooses books on display “at random”.
Peter must have been reading your mind from 5 days ago
Greg, I don’t believe that Peter was being entirely serious with that statement. Of course no library chooses their books “at random”, he was merely expressing his disatisfaction with the selection.
Didn’t Peter work at the Peak body for libraries…
I sometimes wonder, Gavin, especially when I find that the book that I had been asking about for months was sold (after I started requesting it) at the monthly ‘get rid of unwanted books’ sale (to Mrs Evans coincidentally!)
Great, great book. I thoroughly recommend it. I’ll probably buy a copy of it first chance I get.
I don’t really need to say much more than quote that. This is the perfect example of why this exercise is a complete waste of time.
I don’t really need to say much more than quote that. This is the perfect example of why this exercise is a complete waste of time.
i don’t understand your point. are you trying to say fiction aimed at young adults has less literary merit than fiction aimed at other demographics… ? on what basis?
I think you are misunderstanding something, Peter. I don’t believe people really dislike others sleeping in public in their city.
What is likely going on is that people assume anyone sleeping in public, especially during the day or in a not-so-ideal place, is not actually sleeping, but just passed-out drunk. That is why they shy away from you. They fear what you might do if awakened.
Just want to clear up something.
Most big city libraries share their books with suburban libraries. The ‘Melbourne City Library’ is likely made up of dozens of libraries spread around the entire city. Meaning you can pick up and drop off books to different libraries, and the selection of any given library is going to be different and unique at any time. The public non-archival material that Peter found in the city library is likely a ‘random’ selection of the entire catalogue that’s spread out over multiple suburban libraries.
Meanwhile, I’m most surprised by just how much money he’s making, that he can actually spend a couple of dollars on a day at the library and not worry too much about food. This is reassuring, I think.
Still undecided about the actual motives…
I think Natalia is still working off the stereotype of Homeless people that they are all stupid and illiterate and would not value a good book like you or me. Also that they wouldn’t have the resources to buy a book. Natalia, you should read some of the previous posts refuting this stereotype. They far better written than I could ever type here.
@Dave Burton: The State Library is a reference library, not a lending library, and doesn’t share books with suburban libraries. The City Library does, but it’s a regular lending library, and completely different from the State Library (which is where Peter went).
Weel Duh! you are a troll! Baiting people who make legitimate comments and stirring the pot for your own amusement and taking the focus away from the actual project that Peter is doing.
Peter’s Mother, may I suggest that you refrain from commenting on these blogs. By all means read the entries, but I would steer clear of the comments. You are to heavily invested (as a mother should be) with Peter and the amount of negative views that are coming from people here (I include myself in that) means that you will stick up for your son. Combined with trolls like Well Duh! antagonizing other commentators, this dissolves into personal attacks and snide snarky comments about random references , and grammar. (Example the “Mommy dearest” debacle). But it is your call, I cant imagine how stressful this is for you and hope that the end of Feb comes quickly.
@John: Criticism noted. I have been having way too much fun with this blog. This is the first time I’ve ever actually been interested in anything that has been happening in the blogosphere (this should be obvious by my inability use this interweb thingy). I love stirring the pot, it’s what I do best, I think it’s a quality I share with Peter. But I can see how it can be it can be detracting. And how random comments can come back to bite you on the arse (ie the Sarah debacle). I will try to be more contained in future, but I will keep commenting cause I’m still really enjoying the discussion.
Thank you John Locke. I had pretty well decided not to comment much more anyway as this discussion is apparently only open to those who want to criticise Peter, particularly the few self appointed experts on homelessness.
I tried to post a link yesterday which didn’t work so if anyone wants to google ‘homeless forums’ (pages from Australia), choose the first option then scroll down to find Homeless in Australia, it might be a bit more enlightening to those who have a stereotyped image of who a homeless person is and what they may own and do.
@Mrs P: I’m glad you’re on here standing up for your son Mrs P. He may be a bit of a Self-Promoting-Prat. But he’s your Self-Promoting-Prat. And he’s the only one you’ve got! So by all means stand up for him.
PS: I mean Self-Promoting-Prat in the nicest possible way
This is something else for people to think about.
(comment quoted from the homeless forum)
Peter (he of the great privilege) isn’t getting Centrelink payments. He is living on what he can beg. Other homeless people from whose mouths Peter is stealing food by begging may be getting Centrelink payments as well.
(From the Centrelink site: single with no children, 18 years and over and not living at home $377 fortnight)
from the same thread on the homeless forum:
(web links removed as they don’t seem to post here.)
Just read the preview to Day 5. Gavin, if you are reading this, if you want to send them down in a next day envelope, Elizabeth and I can do some typing and email them back to you if that helps. You’ll be getting more days soon on top of that soon I expect.
Peter’s Mum: yeah, there was an error with the code on the latest post, the whole thing should be there now. I’m good for typing them up, don’t have a lot to do during the week.
Okay, you are probably a more efficient typist and more familiar with the html needed anyway.
…but if Peter does start sending more than you have time for, the offer remains open.
Just for a different opinion – Well Duh – I don’t think you’ve been a troll at all. Can’t be bothered going back and checking, but didn’t I see you apologise to someone for mis-reading them or something? I didn’t see Sarah (Mommy Dearest Sarah) do that at all, and I was thinking that she really owed Peter’s Mum an apology.
(I know that she might not have intended to come across that way, but I was reading her tone to be quite combative.)
Anyway, just thought I’d give a different perspective to John Locke’s.
Hi Mrs P and Gav (it’s Well Duh! here),
This discussion seems rather private. I don’t know if you’re aware that its on the public domain.
@U: Thanks U, I try to be ballanced and I’ve apologised several times when I’ve realised I’ve got things wrong. I can be a bit snippy though. I’ve been thinking of changing my monica to “Troll”. I like it!
lol, nothing private. I just couldn’t be bothered finding Gav’s email address. Nice name – I wondered if it were you on the homeless forum.
Yep is was me. I wanted to get some less “privileged” views than my own
This is absolutely ridiculous. Everyone knows that Candice Bergen is Ed Bergen’s son!